1787

1787: 1 Troy Oz. platina (Colombian Spot) = S$ 0.0338

1787: 1 Troy Ounce platina (Spain: off-mkt?) = S$ 0.54091 (~£0.1217)
1787: 1 Troy Oz. platina (Peru: mkt) ~ S$ 1.08 (~£0.2434)


1787: Platinum Chalice, Labor Cost (~63.25 Ozt) S$ 1,277.50

1787: 1 Troy Ounce Platinum (Labor?) = S$ 20.207
1787: 1 Troy Oz. Platinum (Labor?) = S$ 29.658

The skilled silversmith that made this cup is called D. Francisco Alonso. 10,220 was given by the work of actual chalice and paten with his spoon and a box to keep these parts. His Holiness was pleased with a brief on the various indulgences granted and a curious reliquary with True Cross. At the same silversmith was paid 15,000 reals for styling another chalice, paten and spoon also.

King Carlos III presented a platinum chalice to Pope Pius VI:  that chalice weighed 55.45 English Troy Ounces. The paten 6.27 ozt.; the spoon of unknown weight (~ 1.5 Ozt?)

1787-9:




Luis Fermin Capitin Vallvey (The Transport of Platina to Spain in the Late Eighteenth Century) mentions Casa de Platina payment for one odd lot, higher than typical Crown expense but half the South American market-rate in Peru.  As a commodity with poor demand and limited utility, platina was still worth less than Silver in Spanish ports.

Where Rs. 27,072 = S$ 3,384 and 423 Libras ~ 6,256.2 Ozt, or @ S$ 8./Libra

"This platina arrived on December 7th, 1787, and payment was made eight months later. In the “Note of expenses incurred in founding the Royal Platina Plant” payment is recorded of “twenty-seven thousand seventy-two Reals which on August 9th, 1788 were released to the proxy representing Bernardo Roca, resident of Guayaquil in payment for 423 Libras of platina” (26). This amounts to a price of 64 Reales per Libra before expenses, but if Bernardo Roca had sold the platina in Lima he could have received double the amount of money!"

	Year of				Port of
Shipment	arrival	Amount	Kgs	Ship	arrival
1	1767	1 @ 22 Libra	21.62	-	Cadiz
2	1784	12,937 Castellano	59.51	-	Cadiz
3	1787	1 @17 Li	19.32	-	-
4	1787	6 @ 4 Li, 8 Onza	70.94	-	-
5	1787	69 Li 14 On	32.14	F. El Pajaro	Cadiz
6	1787	16 @ 23 Li	194.58	F. La Posta de America	Cadiz
7	1789	122 @ 15 Li 9 On	1310.16	-	-
8	1790	4543 Ca	20.9	B. El Farnoso Sevillano	-
9	1791	45 @ 6 Li	520.26	F. El Riojano	Cadiz
10	1791	962 Ca	4.42	F. El Riojano	Cadiz
11	1791	100 Li 14 On	46.4	P. N. S. Carmen	Cadiz
12	1795	146 Li 9 On	67.3	V. San Carlos	Cadiz
13	1802	2267 Ca 112 Tom.	10.43	F. Sta. Sabina	Cadiz
14	1802	95 314 Li	44.04	F. Sta. Sabina	Cadiz
15	1802	493 Li 9 On	227.04	F. Flor del Paraiso	Cadiz
16	1803	22 Li	10.12	F. Sta. Sabina	Vigo
17	1804	11@- 171b15o 7 0	134.54	B. El Serrano	Cadiz
18	1805	1141b 1 4 0 ~ 5 0 ~	52.77	-	Corunna

"A substantially different figure for the total amount of platina sent to Madrid has been reported by Chaston (18). He suggested that the quantity of crude platina which arrived in Madrid between 1786 and 1808 may have averaged 14,000 to 18,000 Troy oz per year - adding up to perhaps one-third of a million ounces (9560 to 12,320 kg) over the twenty-two year period. This amount is significantly larger than that reported here, although it must be acknowledged that smuggling could account for at least some of the difference between Chaston’s figure and my account of legal commerce."

Chaston (1980) vastly over-estimated the production of refined Platinum in Europe - in fact, crude platina (at 70% purity) landed in Europe would have been that much higher, ~622 - 801 kgs per year.  The total platina export of 1804, however, is well within that range.

"The quantity of malleable platinum turned out over the 22 years mayhave averaged 14,000 to 18,000 oz Troy per year-say one third of a million ounces in all."

A more reasonable estimate follows : the Spanish Mints likely gathered an average of 50-100 kgs of platina per year and European contraband traders 2 -4x that amount: a high estimate of the total platina exported was closer to 85 - 200 kgs, annually.   Broadly speaking, the production and price of platina should simply have followed Gold, by years and seasons and trade access to Carthagena.

The 1788 price paid is identical to the insupportable high (specimen) "spot-price" cited by von Humboldt in 1801, although we might assume the price at Carthagena (as at Lima) was typically double the Source-Spot.  In Choco, bulk spot-prices to contraband traders were conceivably a third higher than the government price, most of the time.



1787: